![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was wrestling with a coat hanger, can you guess who won?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
When, after almost 2 years, I finally created a workstation for myself downstairs at a proper work table, I also moved my gaming computer from that area to my bedroom upstairs. I switched from wired ethernet to wifi. The wifi, however, started failing me almost immediately at the gaming computer alone. Bandwidth was horrible, then my first wifi network stopped connecting at this computer, then the second wifi network started failing too. The wifi was fine on my phone and Chromecast. It was the antenna at my old tower computer that was bad.
I went searching through records, and I originally ordered this wifi adapter (TP-LINK TL-WN881ND 300Mbps) back in 2016. Okay, fair enough. That's a long time for a wifi device to keep working. So, I ordered this wifi adapter (TP-LINK Archer TX55E AX3000) to replace it. It arrived today, and I put it in my gaming computer after work.
My original wifi immediately connected, and bandwidth score went from about 3.5 Mbps download to this very nice 273 Mbps download. Let's just call it a round 100X improvement (it's more like 78X) and move on. :)
The days of monkeying with Linux drivers are past us, for the most part. I plugged this PCI card in, and it just worked.
There are labels that I gladly accept and others that I reject.
For instance:
I should explain that last label, given my longstanding criticism of so many things here in the USA. I want great changes in government and economic structures, yes, but I still want structures. Anarchism has the debatably-laudable goal of making individuals each responsible for all outcomes. It plans to accomplish that goal, thanks to elimination of all hierarchy as a form of coercion. Afterwards, individuals and their choices would be all that matters.
I've recommended the book "The Nature of Economies" by Jane Jacobs many times over the years. It uses easy ecological metaphors to teach ideas that are more complex. I propose a biological metaphor for understanding proposed anarchy. Show me the creature that was formerly a multicellular organism of specialized cells (requiring hierarchy of its own sort) that later backtracked to eliminate that specialization, where each cell becomes master of itself and must negotiate with other cells as equals. Show me how evolution has proved that simplification strategy as more adaptable than advanced specializations, then I'll believe that anarchism is viable at our level too. It seems at first glance, at least, that Mother Nature prefers constant change and reorganization, not mere simplification.
"You've got that eternal idiotic idea that if anarchy came it would come from the poor. Why should it? The poor have been rebels, but they have never been anarchists; they have more interest than anyone else in there being some decent government. The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all. Aristocrats were always anarchists."
- G.K. Chesterton
I still believe in the beauty of complex systems, and I still believe in the possibility of their actually serving the long-term needs of constituent components.
Today's theme song is just mood music for background play. No words, just soft jazz music and the image of an otter as barista at a coffee shop.
Why this choice today? It was shared amongst coworkers on Friday, and I just learned of it today. My supervisor also sent me a message that May 15 Friday was my 2-year anniversary at work, but I was away as part of my "weekend" schedule at the time, returning today as my "Monday". This song is meant to help provide a calming counterbalance to what I've complained for 2 years is a highly stressful job position. As evidence of this stress, I learned today that the guy I trained in October for this job is moving back to his old job. So, after half a year he decided that his former department was better for him. I'm sorry that he didn't want to stick around, but at least he's still staying with the university.
Why is this job so unusual, so stressful? It's different from any tech job I've had before. People call a phone number, expecting to get the experts in whatever topic they selected. Instead, they get me. Questions that I might have to answer at a moment's notice:
Basically, we're the 311 information line for a city (over 100,000 students, faculty, and staff). At some point, we get every question... including wrong calls meant for a similarly-named university or a related-to-the-university healthcare system. We get calls meant for other departments but come to us first. We get calls for areas with VIP lists who want different treatment. It's permutation explosion for everything, no perfect documentation for it, and callers reached me expecting to find the expert on whatever topic is at hand, so they get frustrated when I hesitate.
So, I've mentioned for 2 years how stressed out I get, I'm losing my trainee to his old job soon, and coworkers shared this nice stress-relieving music for jazzy vibes.
Enjoy the music. Peace. :)